YOU SAID:

According to current international human rights law, most states have both positive and negative obligations. What are the positive obligations that most states have committed themselves to and what is the treaty that forms the basis

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとは、ほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務をあります。 ほとんどの州は彼ら自身をコミットしている肯定的な義務であり条約の基礎となるもの

BACK INTO ENGLISH

According to the current international human rights law, most States are both positive and negative obligations. Most States is a positive duty to commit themselves, become the basis of the Treaty.

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。ほとんどの州は彼ら自身を託す、条約の基礎となる肯定的な義務です。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Most States commit themselves, is a positive obligation becomes the basis of the Treaty.

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。ほとんどの州は彼ら自身を託す、肯定的な義務条約の基礎となります。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Most States commit themselves, form the basis of a positive duty.

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。ほとんどの州は彼ら自身を託す、肯定的な義務の基礎を形成します。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Most States commit themselves, form the basis of a positive duty.