YOU SAID:

In terms of raw potential, it seems quite likely there is more “zoning-prevented housing” in the suburbs or in fairly low-density areas than in already high-density ones. The result could easily be that uniform upzoning boosts metro-wide population, but also causes a shift of population out of the center, into the ‘burbs, where geography may prove less of a constraint. The fact that less-regulated places also seem to be less dense suggests that this outcome is at a minimum plausible. That is to say, if density is your goal, deregulation may be a very uncertain way to get there because, while there may well be demand for urban cores (maybe), land use rules are just one of many supply constraints. Geography, higher construction costs, large existing investments, and the dramatically lower costs to adding equivalent supply in the ‘burbs all combine to suggest blanket liberalization could cause the typical household to reside in a less dense neighborhood than they did under stricter regulation.

INTO JAPANESE

生の可能性の面でだ非常に可能性がより「ゾーニング防止住宅の「郊外、もしくはすでに高密度のものよりもかなり低密度地区。結果を簡単にできるその制服 upzoning メトロ全体人口を後押し、メイフィールドの怪人たちに、中心部から人口のシフトを引き起こす地理が可能性があります。